Today, on January 17th 2025, I merged Versia 0.5 into the docs' main
branch.
This release doesn't bring any major changes, being mostly renames and tweaks to make data exchanges more consistent. The most notable changes are:
- Signature headers have been renamed
- The nonce in signatures has been replaced by a timestamp
- Groups are better documented
- (and moved to an extension :p)
- Versia Links are a new feature
- Some
Collections
have been swapped for the simplerURICollection
format - A bunch of new extensions
You can find the full changelog here.
Let's go over everything in more detail.
Line endings
For the sake of consistency across OSes and editors, all text fields in Versia now use Unix line endings (\n
). Most servers already use Unix line endings, but it's good to be explicit about it.
Renamed headers
The following headers have been renamed:
X-Signature
-->Versia-Signature
X-Signed-By
-->Versia-Signed-By
Why? Well, RFC 6648 happened (tldr: the X-
prefix is deprecated).
Nonce no more
The X-Nonce
header in signatures has been replaced by a timestamp. Replay attacks are not really a big concern in the Versia security model, but verifying signature freshness is still a good idea.
What does this prevent?
Here's an example: Alice accidentally posts her full social security number to a public Versia server. Obviously, she immediately deletes the post, but someone with a malicious instance could replay the note federation request to other servers, essentially bringing it back from the dead.
This is a very contrived example, but it's a good illustration of why we should verify the freshness of signatures.
Rate limiting
Obeying IETF draft polli-ratelimit-headers-02 is now mandatory for all Versia implementations. Implementations running on weaker hardware can sometimes struggle with the load of a large number of requests, so it's important to have a way to throttle federation!
As to the draft itself, it was chosen for its simplicity, so you shouldn't have too much trouble implementing it.
Groups
Turns out, Groups
were missing a lot of significant information, like how to actually subscribe and receive updates from them. This has been fixed.
The new system introduces a very similar system to the one used for Follows
, with the following new entities:
pub.versia:groups/Subscribe
pub.versia:groups/Unsubscribe
pub.versia:groups/SubscribeAccept
pub.versia:groups/SubscribeReject
As to federation, the Groups
's home instance can now federate all notes posted to it while keeping the original author's signature, using the new pub.versia:groups/Federate
entity. This avoids the need for forwardable signatures, which are a pain to implement.
To top that all off, Groups
have been moved to an extension, because they were getting too big for the main spec.
Versia Links
A common problem on ActivityPub is that you can easily link to a user or a note via its URI, but to interact with it, you need to have your implementation look up that URI in your favourite client. This is a pain. There should be a way to automatically open your favorite client when you click on a link, right?
Well, the issue comes from the fact that there's no way for a client to tell which URIs are Versia URIs (e.g., https://versia.social/users/jessew
) and which are not (like https://google.com
). This is where Versia Links come in.
They look like this:
# Opens a user profile
web+versia://users/bob.social/alice
# Opens a note
web+versia://notes/jimbob.com/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1
# Opens the composer with a reply to a note
web+versia://reply/bob.social/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1
The web+
prefix allows Web clients to register support for the web+versia
scheme, which will open the link in the user's Versia client. This is a simple way to make Versia URIs stand out from the rest.
Versia Links are meant to be used in instances' web UIs, for logged-out users. This replaces the "type your instance's domain" popup that was previously used in Mastodon, for example.
For more information, check out the Versia Links spec.
Timestamp change
All timestamps now use RFC 3339 instead of ISO 8601. RFC 3339 can be thought as a more restricted version of ISO 8601, which means that most implementations should already be compatible with it.
# ISO 8601
2025-01-17T12:00:00Z
# RFC 3339
2025-01-17T12:00:00Z
# They're the same!
# Except now you can't do this horrible thing anymore:
2025-W03-5T17:04:29/PT2M
Here's a helpful visualization of the differences between the two.
Unix timestamps?
Unix timestamps are great for machines, but they're not very human-readable. RFC 3339 is a good compromise between the two, being both human-readable and easily machine-readable.
$schema
in Entities
Entities can now optionally have a $schema
field, which allows implementations to include a JSON Schema inside the entity.
This is meant for human use only, and not for either clients or servers to validate the entity. Including the implementation's JSON schema in the entity itself can be useful for debugging and documentation purposes.
URICollection
Some Collections
have been swapped for the simpler URICollection
format. This is a simple list of URIs, which can be used for things like a list of followers, for example.
It is much easier to implement than the full Collection
format, plus it's also more lightweight.
{
"author": "https://versia.social/users/018ec082-0ae1-761c-b2c5-22275a611771",
"first": "https://versia.social/users/018ec082-0ae1-761c-b2c5-22275a611771/followers?page=1",
"last": "https://versia.social/users/018ec082-0ae1-761c-b2c5-22275a611771/followers?page=3",
"total": 46,
"next": "https://versia.social/users/018ec082-0ae1-761c-b2c5-22275a611771/followers?page=2",
"previous": null,
"items": [
"https://versia.social/users/f8b0d4b4-d354-4798-bbc5-c2ba8acabfe3",
"https://social.bob.com/u/2B27E62snga763"
]
}
Note collections
Notes now have a collections
field, which regroups outbox
, likes
, replies
, etc.
{
// ...
"collections": {
"replies": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/replies",
"quotes": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/quotes",
"pub.versia:likes/Likes": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/likes",
"pub.versia:likes/Dislikes": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/dislikes",
"pub.versia:reactions/Reactions": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/reactions"
}
}
This is a simpler structure than in Versia 0.4, where everything was its own top-level field:
{
// ...
"replies": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/replies",
"quotes": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/quotes",
"extensions": {
"pub.versia:likes": {
"likes": "https://versia.social/objects/01902e09-0f8b-72de-8ee3-9afc0cf5eae1/likes",
}
}
}
Interaction Controls
The new Interaction Controls Extension allows users to control who can interact with their posts, just like on Bluesky or Twitter. This is great when you're often the target of spam or harassment.
The system has a lot of flexibility while still being simple enough to implement in a weekend or two.
Smaller stuff
- Usernames can now have uppercase characters. Also, they're now case-insensitive, so
jessew
andJesseW
are the same user. - The Vanity Extension now supports a
timezone
field. - Docs have been improved across the board, with more examples and explanations.
Reports
are now transient, and thereason
field was replaced by atags
field.
Conclusion
Is this a large breaking change that will require a lot of work to implement? No, not really. Is it better than the previous version? Yes, definitely.
I hope you have a good time implementing this release. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, Jesse, on these socials. I'm always glad to help.
Happy hacking!